Saturday, February 11, 2012

Ruth/Fiance

Ruth's first courtship she was in was with a great Godly man.  Ruth lied to her father when she told him she wanted to give her heart to him for protection.  Who do you think protects the daughters heart better than a father all of you?  Praying led to an agreeable courtship because Ruth lied to her father don't you see? 
To read more go here.
http://joyfulandsuccessfulhomeschooling.com/hshs/pdfs/courtship_i.pdf

19 comments:

  1. Surely more godly men exist? I'm fairly certain the one that was rejected cannot POSSIBLY be the ONLY godly man on the planet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No, I don't see. Your post is incoherent. Are you sober?

    ReplyDelete
  3. If my father asked me to do something as ungodly and creepy as to 'give him my heart for protection' -- I'd lie to him too.

    And, in case you don't already know, actual real-live great godly men usually display the fruit of the Spirit and other godly tendancies, not including the tendancy to be cruel, controlling or attempt to pressure himself in marriage towards a girl who was not interested in him.

    I think girls are capable of 'protecting' their own hearts (or doing other things with their hearts as they see fit). There is no need to involve another party in that!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Poor poor snowflake. You are the jilted fiance, aren't you?
    Wow, get over it already.
    I was about to type that you are an adult so act like one. But I am not sure that you are an adult because your spelling and grammatical errors are such that no Grade 3 English course would give you a pass.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes- great godly men always fondle their unwilling fiances. . .

    ReplyDelete
  6. And secondly, you ask "Who do you think protects the daughters heart better than a father all of you?" . The answer is in the Bible- "Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life" . . . Proverbs 4:23. This verse commands you to keep your own heart, not to give it to someone else, relieving yourself of the responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here, now. You promised us Ruth's family's side of the story. This isn't their side of the story. It's an ungrammatical and nearly illegible jumble of accusations ("Ruth lied to her father") and assertions (father protect daughters better than anyone).

    Personally, I'd like to hear their side of the story. Unfortunately, what you've written here isn't even close; it's structured more like a gossip column. Please try again.

    And as a side note: when it comes to protecting people for their own good, castles and prisons have the same high walls. The difference is in who controls the gate.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dude. It's the 13th. You haven't written anything since the 11th.

    We're waiting.

    Get on with it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What Montana said. Don't let the fact that you've got the education and writing skills of a four-year-old stand in your way. Nor should you allow yourself to be deterred by the knowledge that, in your misguided efforts to appear relevant, you've managed to title your blog in the most ironic possible way.

    Say "hai" to Darth Daddy for us.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have a feeling that this "writer" is Ruth's former fiancé. If that is the case, he had mentioned how he is happy with his Godly wife and numerous children. That would lead me to believe that ATI worked for him. So why isn't this story about his own success? Wouldn't that be a better "testimony" to ATI than simply trashing someone else?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Can we ask questions about "Rachel" too? How about the mentioned brother who is also living independantly and has left the ATI fold?

    If this is a good ATI family, it sure looks a lot like it's making a train wreck out of ATI objectives. But, you know in the normal world, having adult sons and daughters out of he house managing their own lives is considered completely ordinary.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I suppose you are pretty busy doing all the wrong things about the "Rachel" situation -- so don't worry about getting behind on your blogging.

    Anyhow, we pretty much know that "Ruth" was raised without pity, so you don't actually need to blog to prove it.

    Best wishes!

    ReplyDelete
  13. That's it??? THAT'S IT!?

    The big launch, the bold promises, and all we get is two half-arsed entries before you vanish completely? This is the best you can do to set us all straight about the truth of Ruth's story?

    I feel cheated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know, right?

      Perhaps this great godly man is nothing but a coward who was too easily scared away by people who have had his number from the get go.

      Delete
  14. Are you stumped for ideas?

    Maybe you'd like to blog about the email you sent to 'Rachel' through 'Ruth' -- I understand that you are interested in 'razing' her baby too? Do you want to tell us why you think that helpless baby would benefit from your parenting, when it is clear that the way you raise children tends towards damaging them? Your track record for successful parenting in the IBLP/ATI way is not that strong.

    Isn't the threat of legal action a touch over the top as a tactic to frighten a young pregnant mother back under your control? Don't you know that R&R both have internet access now? It's obvious that no grandparent can sue for custody of a child just because they think they have a mystical right to control the actions of everyone in their family.

    I'm thinking your grandchild will have the best chance at a good life if she never sees your face.

    I feel pretty angry and offended at your continued actions. Perhaps that is inappropriate. After all, repentance is always an option and the Spirit is more than capable of making you into a new person if you let Him. Take a moment and really think these things through -- are you absolutely sure you have treated your children in the way that Jesus commands you to treat 'one another' in the Bible? Are you certain? Could you look it up?

    ReplyDelete
  15. So she was forced/brainwashed into giving her heart to Daddy. Daddy used that power to try and marry her off to some creep who (I have no doubt in my mind) used her as some sort of hole in the mattress who also took care of every one of his needs without question. She'd be forced into pregnancies she didn't want and the poor kids would have been neglected and abused like she had. She never entered into a courtship. She ran from a forced courtship. There's a word for what her daddy tried to do to her, its called slavery. She liberated herself. Her parents are trash and I hope her father suffers in his final days (which I hear are now).

    ReplyDelete
  16. Sorry, but you're still brainwashed. My family dabbled in ATI many years ago, and what she writes rings true.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi! I need the owner of this blog to contact me at contact@truth-about-ruth.com. I suspect that won't happen as this blog seems to be an antagonist sock puppet, in the vein of the "couple" who set up the NPM blog to "stalk" Possummomma. If I am proven incorrect, I will be only too happy to delete this comment. Thanks! :)

    ReplyDelete