Who is Ruth?
"Ruth" is an blogger who should not cuz her writing sucks. "Ruth" is should be living how God calls us to live. almost thirty by my math. "Ruth" says her family is ATI. Who that leaves the family unit can't be role models. "Ruth" won't name her family cuz she says ATI would kill her family or baloney. "Ruth" is a scammer who asks for money from people at another pityful website that attacks many honestChristian families who did nothing to hurt a soul at Free Jinger Duggar. "Ruth" got her start at a site called No Longer Quivering which is ran by the bigger scammer we need to see if Vicky and Ruth are the same.
What has Ruth done to me?
She says things about my beliefs that aren't true and I am in ATI and I know her family. It hurts my right to practice my religion cause people see what this ugly woman rights. If you want to know the truth about ATI I will tell you if you want to know.
Why do we need Ruth With Out Pity?
To show both sides. I will tell you her families side of the story.
Ruth was a selfish girl then and now. Ruth has been sainted on that site that mocks true faith believers and it's time that stopped. Her blog makes true ATI families pained. Watch the Duggar family! The only reason people read Ruth so they can make an excuse to crucify the Duggars. HE knows who the righteous are and we serve HIM by expossing lies.
Want to help me then start a comment leaving your question about Ruth. Truth and light will prevail. IN JESUS NAME.
Of course you are ATI, you can't write for shit. Perhaps you should read a grammar book and learn how to construct a sentence that makes sense. Then maybe your blog will have some meaning.
ReplyDeleteI find it funny that so many patriarchs are freaking out about a single critic.
My goodness. There is so much anger in this post; so much fear.
ReplyDeleteI do agree, however, that your poor spelling and grammar aren't compelling me to read much further than this. I hope you will do something to fix that.
Since English apparently isn't your first language, I'll make some suggestions on how to improve your grammar. Hopefully, it will improve the quality of your future writing endeavors.
ReplyDeleteYour text:
"Ruth" is an blogger who should not cuz her writing sucks.
"cuz" is not a word. Do you mean 'because'? You are also missing a direct object. Also, sucks is a bit too colloquial. Do you mean to write: Ruth is a blogger who should not blog because her writing is poor.
Your text:
"Ruth" is should be living how God calls us to live.
Your verb structure is extremely subpar. I'm not exactly sure what you mean because the structure make the intention unclear. Do you mean: Ruth should be living how God calls us to live OR Ruth is not living how God calls us to live.
Your text:
almost thirty by my math
This phrase is a sentence fragment. You lack both a subject and a verb. In English, we require both for a phrase to be considered sentences. For future reference, almost is an adverb and "by my math" is a prepositional phrase. Perhaps you mean: Ruth is almost thirty by my math.
Your text:
"Ruth" says her family is ATI.
Congratulations! This sentence is technically correct. However, there is a stylistic flaw in your structure. When a person uses an acronym for the first time, it is considered important to define the acronym for clarity.
Perhaps you mean: Ruth says her family is Advanced Training Institute (ATI).
Your text:
Who that leaves the family unit can't be role models.
Unfortunately, you created a sentence fragment again. Repetitive sentence fragments are both confusing and poor style.
Perhaps you mean: A person who leaves the family unit cannot be a role model.
See how that sentence demonstrates a better command of the English language?
I could continue to edit this entire post because it is rife with multiple errors and style problems. I suggest consulting an English textbook if you intend to post again. Most of your errors should be addressed by something in the third or fourth grade level. Good luck!
LIKE LIKE LIKE!!! Your edumication is too much for the dullard who started this blog to take. Clearly he can't take the heat and has left the kitchen. The comments here are priceless.
DeleteHomeskool!
ReplyDeleteHey, I know lots of home school families who do a very good job of educating their kids. If it's not for you, fine, but don't let this example (who in all fairness may NOT be home schooled) sour you on those who do do it, and do it well, okay?
DeleteWho is Ruth?
ReplyDeleteRuth is a nice person who writes well. Many people are interested in what she shares. I think writing is also good for her, both intellectually and emotionally. I hope your blogging expereince improves your writing ability.
Nobody but Ruth and God knows His calling about how she should live.
I consider it wise for Ruth to keep her identity secret on the internet. It is part of respecting to privacy of other persons to whom she is related. It would probably be wise for you to do the same. The internet isn't always a friendly place.
There are no indications that any of the people or websites listed are scams.
What has Ruth done to you?
It seems that she has had similar experiences to yours, and yet has formed a different opinion about those experiences.
The fact that she has a negative opinion about something you are fond, and the fact that she publically shares that opinion with others -- of IN NO WAY influence your ability to engage in the religious activities of your choice.
Why do you need Ruth With Out Pity?
Because you lack pity for Ruth and want to advertize that fact. And it seems that you like to call people names. Enjoy your freedom to do so, but it's not likely to gain you any respect.
Feel free to air your views... but many of your readers are likely to recognize your genre of verbage and your capitalization pattern. Which makes me want to ask you some personal questions... but I'm sure we'll have plenty of time for that.
I'm guessing you were homeschooled? It shows.
ReplyDeleteIf you know who Ruth is, why are you protecting her identity? Obviously, not to protect her family, because apparently every person in ATI has found her anonymous blog! Why should we believe that you OR Ruth are telling the truth? Frankly, I don't believe that Ruth always tells the truth. But I don't think you do, either. I doubt you even know her. For all I know, you ARE Ruth trying to stir up drama and sympathy. So, if you know her and her family, what can you tell us that we don't know? If I am being scammed, I want to know! I have invested a lot of emotional empathy to Ruth, and I have even donated to her once or twice. But I don't want to be scammed by you anymore than I want to be scammed by Ruth, so how about some proof?
ReplyDeleteWhat is your first language? It can't possibly be English.
ReplyDeleteRazingRuthWithoutPity (RRWoP) is a blogger who should not be blogging, because their only purpose is to cause pain and harm to one of God's children. He or she would do well to remember Jesus's words to His disciples, "Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." Although we do not know who RRWoP is, they claim to be members of the Advanced Training Institute (ATI)*, "a home education program that provides curriculum and training to support parents in raising their children to love the Lord Jesus Christ, reason wisely based on the principles of Scripture, have world-changing purpose in life, and give Biblical answers to the needs of our day." The ATI program is accused of being not just a homeschooling curriculum, but a belief system capable of exerting extreme social pressure from its members. Although certainly not all homeschooling families who have used ATI have a negative experience, many people have reported that their lives were made worse by the encounter. RRWoP's main motivation for starting a blog is to defend ATI against criticism. We cannot say if ATI's teachings were so immoral as to encourage this kind of behavior, but it was apparently unable to teach RRWoP what a classless, un-Godly, and spiteful action it was.
ReplyDeleteInstead of attacking a young woman for her writing abilities, looks, and other attributes that are irrelevant to whether ATI can be harmful, RRWoP could have started a blog detailing how ATI has helped them or their family. They could have combated criticism of ATI by highlighting the benefits of the program, or listed "success stories" of the ATI community--good works or happy lives. RRWoP says they want to tell "both sides" of the story, but so far they have only demonstrated a panicked backlash to criticism. The illogical and irrelevant name-calling directed at Ruth only serves to back-up her claims that the ATI system does not produce more Godly or moral people than the general population.
I have lived a life completely devoid of the legalistic rules ATI imposes on daughters and wives (of which I am both). My family is happy. Children are not disowned. Revenge blogs are unnecessary. I have no questions about Ruth. But I have a question about RRWoP--what made you so unhappy?
Vicky's story is told by reporter Kathryn Joyce here: http://www.salon.com/2009/03/14/joyce_quiverfull/singleton/ It is unlikely a reporter mistook a childless woman in her twenties for a mother of seven in her forties. There are many indications that Vicky is a person separate from Ruth that can be discovered by simply Googling her name.
*Thanks, Anon Mouse!
"Want to help me then start a comment leaving your question about Ruth."
ReplyDeleteOkay, I have a question. Do you think it's possible that there's any validity to Ruth's view of ATI? Could it be that there are some flaws in the lifestyle, even if Ruth's reporting of them is exaggerated and overblown?
I have other questions, but you specified "about Ruth" so they'll have to wait.
Question about Ruth:
ReplyDeleteDo you thing she, upon completion of the ATI program of child indoctrination, is adiquately prepared to live a successful and godly life?
If so, do you think she is now living a successful and godly life? If not, which component of the ATI program of child indoctrination failed to achieve its objective with respect to this child? Do you consider the flaw to be in the program, or in the way it was applied by the parents in this particular case?
Buy a dictionary. Please.
ReplyDeleteDude, you are living in a glass house ... don't throw stones. Your writing is AWFUL. You should learn to make a coherent statement before insulting the writing of others.
ReplyDeletehilarious!!!! and embarrassing, dude- you are an advertisement for how poorly educated people turn out if they survive the ati indoctrination in their childhood. seriously, what did you guys do for grammar class in your home school? recite glowing speeches praising your lord & savior, bill gothard? huh.... doesn't look like that was a very sensible use of your time, since you wanted to be a blogger when you grew up......
ReplyDelete